
The first results of eLife’s pioneering peer review system might point to the future of scientific publication. Continue reading

The first results of eLife’s pioneering peer review system might point to the future of scientific publication. Continue reading

What we say and what we mean in our responses to reviewers. Continue reading

TIR reimagines Ridley Scott’s dystopian science-fiction classic “Blade Runner” for a modern PhD/postdoc audience. Continue reading

A team of good guys band together to take on a rampaging behemoth. Continue reading

How much can one individual do to influence the output of a field? Continue reading

Getting them aligned isn’t always easy.

Journals like to pretend that the impact factor is like a batting average in sports. But it’s not.

Scientific papers have become too long. It’s time to move in the opposite direction. Continue reading

A quick tip of the hat this week from TIR to Nature Communications. In an editorial published on September 12, they have announced that from now on they will list (on an opt-in basis) all preprints undergoing review for publication in the journal. The move is an important step in the ongoing change to the way that priority of discovery is determined in research. Continue reading

It’s a shame that the prevailing emotion upon acceptance of a paper tends to be relief rather than elation. Continue reading